|
Edited by shinee. at 2020-1-18 06:21 PM
I am not denying that people use tanks. Someone has to do it after all. I am just saying that tanks are not voluntarily preferred. Sure some people would gladly tank but most people don't really want to. That's why you always see everyone crying "We need a tank" during a match.
And yes Belerick became a strong pick after his revamp but I dont think that justifies a nerf on him when clearly there are other heroes that desperately need to be nerfed.
As for Baxia, I think he's been hit way too hard with the nerf hammer. His passive and his ultimate got such hard nerfs. I bought him the day he was released and I thought "yeah he might be cool and fun but he's clearly useless with his skills". Then the devs made adjustments to his skills and bang he was so much more useful. But then you struck him with nerfs? Why?
Why make him useless again?
BD007 replied at 2020-1-18 02:05 PM
Baxia is number 1 pick in higher rank division(mythical glory and above). That is why baxia has been ...
Lol no man. The number 1 pick would always be Franco. As far as hero rankings go, Franco is the most picked tank in high elo. By those standards, Baxia has never stood anywhere near in terms of pick rate. I don't know how much baxia was picked before he was nerfed but currently his popularity is less than 1%. Even from personal experience, he never gets banned or picked. So you guys literally nerfed a hero that already no one was playing.
|
|